主題

Topic

TowardanEpistemology of Al Regulation

主持人

Chair

王國豫

復(fù)旦大學(xué)科技倫理與人類未來研究院院長

復(fù)旦大學(xué)哲學(xué)學(xué)院教授

Dean of the Institute of Technology Ethics

for Human Future, Fudan University

Professor at the School of Philosophy, Fudan University

報告人

Speaker

Hernán Gabriel Borisonik

阿根廷圣馬丁國立大學(xué)人文學(xué)院副教授

國家科技研究理事會研究員

復(fù)旦發(fā)展研究院訪問學(xué)者

Associate Professor at the School of Humanities, Universidad Nacional de San Martin (UNSAM)

Argentina Researcher at National Scientific

and Technical Research Council (CONICET)

Visiting Scholar, Fudan Development Institute

時間

Time

2025年12月2日（星期二）16:00-18:00

16:00-18:00, December 2nd, 2025 (Tue)

活動地點(diǎn)

Venue

復(fù)旦大學(xué)邯鄲校區(qū)

復(fù)旦源A棟科技倫理與人類未來研究院205室

Room 205, Institute of Technology Ethics

for Human Future,

Fudan Yuan Building A,

Fudan University (Handan Campus)

主辦

Host

科技倫理與人類未來研究院

Institute of Technology Ethics for Human Future

復(fù)旦發(fā)展研究院

Fudan Development Institute

復(fù)旦-拉美大學(xué)聯(lián)盟

Fudan-Latin America, University Consortium

摘要

Abstract

This seminar explores the philosophical and political foundations of artificial intelligence (Al) regulation, focusing on how different societies conceptualize the ethical, institutional, and epistemic dimensions of technological governance. Drawing on the notion ofsociotechnical imaginaries, l will examine how dominant Western frameworks-particularly those of the European Union and the United States-project a universalist vision that often conceals their own normative and cultural assumptions. To ground this argument, l will refer to my work in political philosophy and science and technology studies (STS), together with my experience in Al public policy in Argentina, where l have collaborated with the National Congress's Commission on Al and to the public policy initiative for an Argentine University Council for Strategic Technologies and Artificial lntelligence. Rather than proposing a regulatory model from or for any particular region, the seminar seeks to open a dialogue attentive to the diversity of ethical and philosophical traditions that shape regulatory thought, in this spirit, we will consider how normative frameworks emerge at the intersection of political imaginaries, institutional practices, and technological infrastructures. Ultimately, l aim to foster an interdisciplinary conversation on how to build more epistemically plural and politically viable foundations for Al governance, with a particular interest in learning from and dialoguing with the significant contributions emerging from Chinese scholarship and policy.