太平洋足夠大，容得下中美兩國(guó)！

但“東海不是很寬”，不一定容得下日本這個(gè)下等小國(guó)。

當(dāng)軍事專(zhuān)家兼評(píng)論員的宋忠平先生對(duì)日本發(fā)出“東海不是很寬”的警告之時(shí)，不知道日本有沒(méi)有意識(shí)的到其全日本領(lǐng)土都會(huì)成“戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)”的可能，不知道那個(gè)叫做高市早苗的日本女首相有沒(méi)有在睡覺(jué)的時(shí)候被黑夜的“夢(mèng)魘之幕”驚醒？

夜郎自大說(shuō)的是日本，蚍蜉撼樹(shù)、不自量力說(shuō)的也是日本。只可惜日本并不明白自己的“斤兩”，還在做著蹬鼻子上臉的惡行。日本通過(guò)“賣(mài)身”的可恥行為坐在了西方國(guó)家G7的桌子邊上，就被“笑貧不笑娼”了？日本自以為傍上了美國(guó)的大粗腿，舔上了美國(guó)的大屁股，就可以成為“發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家俱樂(lè)部”成員了？殊不知、其就是美國(guó)的一條玩物狗而已。如果條件具備，如果我們想要，可以隨意發(fā)動(dòng)對(duì)日本的滅國(guó)之戰(zhàn)，隨時(shí)都可以打死美國(guó)的這條“日本狗”。

日本一直自以為是的認(rèn)為其會(huì)成為我們的一盤(pán)菜，但我們從來(lái)沒(méi)有正眼瞧得上這個(gè)殖民地的下等小國(guó)。我們所有的準(zhǔn)備，所進(jìn)行的“備戰(zhàn)備荒”的箭頭都指向了日本這個(gè)奴隸背后的洋主子“洋爺”——美國(guó)。有句話(huà)說(shuō)得非常好：“打狗也得看主人”，背后之意就是打狗也得要方著狗的主人。畢竟我們和日本這條狗的主人——美國(guó)，還有千絲萬(wàn)縷的各種政治經(jīng)濟(jì)軍事的交易往來(lái)，也不能說(shuō)斷就斷。

如果按照資本主義國(guó)家的那一套做派，我們完全可以在必要的時(shí)候考慮和美國(guó)達(dá)成交易，進(jìn)而私下里分區(qū)軍事占領(lǐng)或瓜分日本，達(dá)到“共治共管”日本的初級(jí)目的。記住這僅僅是第一步。

美國(guó)這個(gè)時(shí)候，可以邀請(qǐng)我們和他們一起“共治共管”日本，就像當(dāng)年的奧巴馬政府那樣，力邀我們和美國(guó)一起共治世界的那樣（西方媒體隨即就以G2稱(chēng)呼中美）。我們對(duì)共治世界沒(méi)有興趣，但對(duì)“共治共管”日本的興趣，應(yīng)該還是有的。

下一步、一旦美國(guó)被其國(guó)內(nèi)的債務(wù)拖垮了，美利堅(jiān)聯(lián)邦解體了，那么、我們可以在第一時(shí)間有效地全面接管日本、控制日本、分割日本。畢竟120多個(gè)美國(guó)軍事基地及其先進(jìn)武器落入日本并不是一個(gè)好的兆頭。美國(guó)走了，我們得學(xué)會(huì)接手如何奴役日本的這項(xiàng)“工作”。

所以，太平洋足夠大，能夠容得下中美兩國(guó)包括中美“共治共管”日本，也能夠容得下中美俄演繹“大三國(guó)”故事。但“東海不是很寬”，日本非得要作死，那么、就徹底一點(diǎn)兒，將其“打包”送走，渣兒都不要留。其實(shí)，對(duì)于日本來(lái)說(shuō)，太平洋也不是很寬，美國(guó)容不下日本，所以將“狗鏈子”栓得很緊；俄羅斯也容不下日本，時(shí)不時(shí)地踢上幾腳。這就是日本這個(gè)奴才的命，活該挨揍。

（以下是英文版 English edtion）

“Global Refuel”, Episode 4: Can China and the United States Jointly “Co-manage” Japan at This Stage?

The Pacific Ocean is vast enough to accommodate both China and the United States!
However, the "East China Sea is not very wide," and it may not necessarily accommodate a lower-tier small country like Japan.

When military expert and commentator Mr. Song Zhongping issued the warning to Japan that the "East China Sea is not very wide," one wonders if Japan has realized the possibility that its entire territory could become a "battlefield." One also wonders if that Japanese female politician, Ms. Takaichi Sanae, has been jolted awake by the "curtain of nightmares" in the dark of night?

The phrase "Yelang thinks too highly of itself" refers to Japan, and "an ant trying to shake a tree—overestimating its own strength" also describes Japan. It is a pity that Japan does not understand its own "weight" and continues to engage in despicable behavior, overstepping its bounds. Japan has shamelessly secured a seat at the table of the Western G7 by "selling itself," but does that mean it is now "praised for wealth rather than shamed for dishonor"? Japan thinks that by clinging to America's thick thigh and licking America's backside, it has become a member of the "club of developed countries"? Little does it know that it is merely America's plaything—a dog. If conditions permit, if we so desire, we could launch a war to annihilate Japan at any time, and at any moment, we could put down this "Japanese dog" of the United States.

Japan has always arrogantly believed that it could become a dish on our plate, but we have never deigned to cast a glance at this lower-tier small country—a colony. All our preparations, our "preparations for war and famine," are aimed at Japan's master behind the slave—the "Western master," the United States. There is a saying that goes very well: "If you beat a dog, you must also face its master." The underlying meaning is that when beating a dog, one must also be wary of its owner. After all, we and the United States—the owner of this dog—still have countless political, economic, and military exchanges, which cannot be severed overnight.

If we were to follow the practices of capitalist countries, we could, when necessary, consider reaching a deal with the United States to jointly militarily occupy or partition Japan, achieving the preliminary goal of "co-governing and co-managing" Japan. Remember, this is only the first step.

At this point, the United States could invite us to "co-govern and co-manage" Japan together, just as the Obama administration once strongly invited us to co-govern the world (Western media subsequently referred to China and the U.S. as G2). We have no interest in co-governing the world, but we might have some interest in "co-governing and co-managing" Japan.

The next step: once the United States is dragged down by its domestic debt and the American federation collapses, we can, at the first opportunity, effectively take over Japan in its entirety, control Japan, and partition Japan. After all, the presence of over 120 U.S. military bases and their advanced weapons in Japan is not a good sign. If the United States leaves, we must learn to take over the "work" of enslaving Japan.

Therefore, the Pacific Ocean is vast enough to accommodate both China and the United States, including their "co-governance and co-management" of Japan, and it is also vast enough to accommodate the "great power triangle" story of China, the United States, and Russia. However, the "East China Sea is not very wide." If Japan insists on seeking its own destruction, then let it be thorough—let it be "packaged up" and sent away, without leaving even a trace.

In fact, for Japan, the Pacific Ocean is not very wide either. The United States cannot accommodate Japan, which is why it keeps the "dog leash" tightly fastened. Russia also cannot accommodate Japan, occasionally giving it a kick. This is the fate of a lackey like Japan—it deserves to be beaten.