美國(guó)總統(tǒng)特朗普先生于2026年01月03日凌晨下令對(duì)委內(nèi)瑞拉這樣一個(gè)主權(quán)國(guó)家進(jìn)行軍事打擊，已經(jīng)造成了委內(nèi)瑞拉國(guó)內(nèi)士兵、平民傷亡，軍事設(shè)施被轟炸。美軍三角洲特種部隊(duì)并將委內(nèi)瑞拉總統(tǒng)馬杜羅先生及其夫人西莉亞﹒弗洛雷斯（Cilia Flores）女士公開(kāi)綁架并帶離。這是對(duì)一個(gè)主權(quán)國(guó)家的粗暴踐踏和直接侵略。這也從側(cè)面說(shuō)明了委內(nèi)瑞拉被美國(guó)滲透成篩子了，沒(méi)有委內(nèi)瑞拉國(guó)內(nèi)的“漢奸”相配合，美軍是不容易做得到的。

委內(nèi)瑞拉方面包括副總統(tǒng)德?tīng)栁鳗q羅德里格斯先生已經(jīng)確認(rèn)了上述有關(guān)馬杜羅先生及夫人的消息并表示了強(qiáng)烈譴責(zé)；委內(nèi)瑞拉國(guó)防部長(zhǎng)弗拉迪米爾﹒帕德里諾﹒洛佩斯（Vldimir Padrino Lopez）先生已經(jīng)視察了被美國(guó)轟炸后軍營(yíng)，表示堅(jiān)決抵抗侵略；委內(nèi)瑞拉常駐聯(lián)合國(guó)代表團(tuán)已經(jīng)致函聯(lián)合國(guó)安理會(huì)要求主持公道。與此同時(shí)，美國(guó)司法部長(zhǎng)帕姆﹒邦迪（Pam Bondi）女士表示馬杜羅先生及其妻子已經(jīng)在紐約被起訴。這是什么事兒?。咳思液么跏且粐?guó)總統(tǒng)先生，因?yàn)椴缓厦绹?guó)意了，就被直接“綁架”到美國(guó)審判。

這事兒怎么說(shuō)怎么有些說(shuō)不過(guò)去??！但人家美國(guó)還就這么干了，委內(nèi)瑞拉就真的沒(méi)有脾氣。國(guó)力衰微，委內(nèi)瑞拉哪是超級(jí)大國(guó)的對(duì)手啊？但是，道理卻在那兒擺著呢！美國(guó)就是侵略，公然違背《聯(lián)合國(guó)憲章》等國(guó)際法。這不僅僅是強(qiáng)權(quán)政治和霸權(quán)主義的做派，更是打家劫舍的劫匪和亡命江湖的亡命徒的行徑，連索馬里海盜都不如。

美國(guó)貌似打了一張“好牌”，大獲全勝了，特朗普總統(tǒng)先生也表示非常的高興。但問(wèn)題是如何“處置”馬杜羅總統(tǒng)先生及其夫人就是一個(gè)難題了。別看美國(guó)現(xiàn)在如何如何的，弄不好、美國(guó)唯一超級(jí)大國(guó)的國(guó)際地位會(huì)就此與美國(guó)“別過(guò)”的。美國(guó)的“后院”已經(jīng)起風(fēng)了，但美國(guó)卻依然自以為是的在“玩兒火”；拋開(kāi)這些不說(shuō)，美國(guó)紐約乃至最高法院的“戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)”，國(guó)際社會(huì)尤其是聯(lián)合國(guó)的“戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)”不知道美國(guó)政府準(zhǔn)備好了沒(méi)？

（以下是英文版 The next is English edition）

Global Refuel Station Issue 19: The United States Brazenly Violates the UN Charter by Kidnapping President Maduro and His Wife Within Venezuela

(Saturday Evening, January 3, 2026)

US President Donald Trump ordered a military strike against the sovereign nation of Venezuela in the early hours of January 3, 2026. This attack has already resulted in casualties among Venezuelan soldiers and civilians, and the bombardment of military facilities. US Delta Force special operations troops have also publicly kidnapped and removed Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. This constitutes a brutal trampling and direct aggression against a sovereign nation. It also indicates, from another perspective, that Venezuela has been infiltrated extensively by the United States. Without the cooperation of "traitors" within Venezuela, the US military would not have found it so easy to accomplish this.

Venezuelan officials, including Vice President Delcy Rodríguez, have confirmed the aforementioned news regarding President Maduro and his wife and have expressed strong condemnation. Venezuelan Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino López has inspected military camps bombed by the US and vowed resolute resistance against the aggression. The Venezuelan Permanent Mission to the United Nations has already sent a letter to the UN Security Council demanding justice. Meanwhile, US Attorney General Pam Bondi has stated that President Maduro and his wife have been indicted in New York. What kind of affair is this? He is, after all, the president of a country. Simply because he does not align with US interests, he is directly "kidnapped" and brought to the United States for trial.

However one looks at it, this seems utterly unreasonable! Yet, the United States has done precisely that, and Venezuela truly seems powerless to respond. With its national strength diminished, how can Venezuela be a match for a superpower? However, the principle remains clear: the United States is the aggressor, openly violating the UN Charter and other international laws. This is not merely an act of power politics and hegemony; it is the behavior of a marauding bandit and a desperate outlaw, even worse than Somali pirates.

The United States appears to have played a "winning card," achieving a great victory, and President Trump has expressed great satisfaction. But the problem lies in how to "deal with" President Maduro and his wife. Despite how the US may currently present the situation, if mishandled, the United States' position as the sole superpower might well "bid farewell" to it. America's "backyard" is already stirring, yet the US persists in its self-righteous "playing with fire." Setting that aside, it remains to be seen whether the US government is prepared for the "battlefield" that will be its New York courts and Supreme Court, and the "battlefield" of the international community, particularly the United Nations.