加拿大安大略省筆譯口譯協(xié)會(huì)（atio）認(rèn)證翻譯、加拿大認(rèn)證esl老師、留學(xué)申請(qǐng)顧問。

承接駕照、結(jié)婚證、房產(chǎn)證、出生證、疫苗證、護(hù)照、銀行流水、資產(chǎn)證明、聘用信、推薦信、營業(yè)執(zhí)照等翻譯。速度快、信達(dá)雅、收費(fèi)合理。不滿意原銀退還。

溫哥華英文教練，致力于地道英文表達(dá)

下面這段敘述，講的是在克里米亞戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)時(shí)期，英國的《泰晤士報(bào)》對(duì)前線的報(bào)道，讓英國軍方很不爽，指責(zé)報(bào)社以及記者危害了盟軍在前線的行動(dòng)。軍方的指責(zé)不完全是空穴來風(fēng)，因?yàn)橐晃欢碥姷母呒?jí)指揮官就特別喜歡看《泰晤士報(bào)》，通過閱讀，他可以了解到盟軍的一些行動(dòng)計(jì)劃。針對(duì)這一指責(zé)，《泰晤士報(bào)》向公眾展示了在報(bào)道面世前，已經(jīng)事先周知了軍方，并通過了審查。這樣一來，政府的指控就落空了，直接導(dǎo)致政府沒能通過信任投票而下臺(tái)。這一回合，以《泰晤士報(bào)》大獲全勝告終，從此聲譽(yù)鵲起。

The Government retaliated by accusing The Times and Russell in particular of compromising the security of Allied operations in the Crimea. On this point the Government did have some grounds for criticism. It became known after the war that the Russian commander of Sebastopol, Prince Gortschakoff, was an avid reader of The Times; he had had copies of the newspaper forwarded to him from Warsaw throughout the siege of Sebastopol. Although Gorstchakoff stated that he had learnt nothing of value militarily from his reading of The Times, it is very doubtful that this was the whole truth given the comprehensive nature of some of the correspondents’ reports. However, The Times was able to defuse this potentially disastrous situation by revealing that Russell and the other correspondents had offered to allow their reports to be read and censored by the authorities before publication. This of course turned the tables on the Government, reinforcing in the public’s mind the picture of a government mired in incompetence. The result of all this was a vote of no confidence in the Government on 29 January 1855. The Government lost the vote by a majority of 157 and had to resign. The Times and its correspondent Russell had scored a massive victory against an incompetent and complacent administration.

上面的段落劃橫線的地方（包括標(biāo)點(diǎn)符號(hào)），是這段敘述的文句精華，我把它們拎出來，以期讀者能品出其中的妙處：你最好把它們背下來，用在你的寫作中。類似的短文，我會(huì)在這個(gè)欄目中經(jīng)常推出。